<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Enviro-Mentalist &#187; Travel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/category/travel/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk</link>
	<description>An Ordinary Person's Views on Living With Minimal Environmental Impact</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Travel &#8211; the good, the bad and the ugly.</title>
		<link>http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/travel-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/travel-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clare Topping</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work-Life Balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commuting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[railway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[train]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I attended a conference in London for two (non-consecutive) days.  I decided that the easiest and most environmentally friendly way of getting there would be by train &#8211; no worries about getting lost (!! although I managed this anyway) or congestion charges. First, the good.  I booked my tickets online and the process [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week I attended a conference in London for two (non-consecutive) days.  I decided that the easiest and most environmentally friendly way of getting there would be by train &#8211; no worries about getting lost (!! although I managed this anyway) or congestion charges.</p>
<div id="attachment_388" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/uploads/img_3205.jpg" rel="lightbox[382]"><img class="size-medium wp-image-388 " title="img_3205" src="http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/uploads/img_3205-300x225.jpg" alt="Houses of Parliament" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Houses of Parliament</p></div>
<p>First, the good.  I booked my tickets online and the process went smoothly.  I opted to travel from Long Buckby which is the closest station (I thought about Rugby, but that doubled the price) and managed to get a one day travel card incorporated into the ticket &#8211; bargain!</p>
<p>The journey &#8211; the first day was fine.  I discovered that the train from Long Buckby went all the way to London, but took about 30 minutes longer than the Virgin Pendolino service that was non-stop from Northampton.  I opted for the Virgin train as I had to be in Lambeth by 8:30.  The train was quite full, but there were some seats.  I got to London on time and negotiated the tube OK.  Coming back I had to catch the London Midland train which stopped at various places on the way.  This was busier (until Milton Keynes) and slower, and then I still had to get home from Northampton.  </p>
<p>The second day was a different story.  I only had to be there for 9am, but the Virgin train was cancelled, so I stayed on the train from Long Buckby.  The train before this one had been cancelled, so it was busier, and there was a break down further down the track, so it was late.  I got into London 30 minutes later and the tube was heaving.  I had to wait for three before I could squeeze on (thank you to the woman who stood in the entrance blocking the way with her suitcase &#8211; not!).  When I got to Lambeth the roads were also noticeably busier, but I reached the venue with a couple of minutes to spare.  The journey back involved a race across London to get an earlier, direct train to Long Buckby &#8211; again down to standing room only, but better than sitting in Northampton station at 7pm.</p>
<p>The thing that surprised me (not having commuted for years and certainly not to London) was the sheer volume of people that move around each day, each year.  </p>
<p>The tube works amazingly well considering there are about 2.7 million people using it each day (figure taken from <a href="http://www.tubelife.org/littlepersons/useless-tube-facts">Tube Life</a>).  But my question is, why are we making that many journeys?  The figure of 2.7 million doesn&#8217;t include those who drive, walk, take the bus, these are just people using the underground in London.  When I look at the trains, these were all full, as were the platforms at the stations we passed through.  Then, when I listen to the travel news, the roads are all full.  When you add the fact that there are 200 million airline passengers each year, it seems as though we are all on the move.</p>
<p>So, my questions are as follows:</p>
<p>Where are we all going?</p>
<p>How many of these journeys are really necessary?</p>
<p>The trains to and from London are packed &#8211; why are there not more trains?  In particular, if there is a direct train from Virgin that gets to London by 8am, why is there not one from London to Northampton (OK, I would allow it to stop in Milton Keynes) between 5 and 6pm to take all of the morning commuters home?</p>
<p>Why does it cost twice as much to travel from Rugby to London as from Northampton to London?  Is it because most journeys from Northampton have to be with London Midland, and Virgin, whilst being much faster, is also much more expensive?  (The direct train to Long Buckby with London Midland also stops in Rugby.)</p>
<p>Why is there not a better transport policy in Daventry to take people to and from Long Buckby station so I wouldn&#8217;t have to take the car at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/travel-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There is no such thing as an environmentally &#8211; friendly diesel car.</title>
		<link>http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/there-is-no-such-thing-as-an-environmentally-friendly-diesel-car.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/there-is-no-such-thing-as-an-environmentally-friendly-diesel-car.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clare Topping</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particulates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/there-is-no-such-thing-as-an-environmentally-friendly-diesel-car.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest issue of the RSC&#8217;s Chemistry World (April 2008/Volume 5/Number 4/Page4) there is a small news article confirming what I have always suspected &#8211; there is no such thing as a good diesel car. The article reports on recently published findings which seem to indicate that far from being better for the environment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest issue of the RSC&#8217;s <em>Chemistry World</em> (April 2008/Volume 5/Number 4/Page4) there is a small news article confirming what I have always suspected &#8211; there is no such thing as a good diesel car.  The article reports on recently published findings which seem to indicate that far from being better for the environment (of which we are a part) low emission diesels may in fact be worse than their soot-chucking predecessors.  The smaller sizes of the emitted particles can apparently penetrate more easily into lung tissue.  This just goes to prove that the only way to help the environment and ourselves is to leave the car at home and use our feet &#8211; after all, that is why we have them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/there-is-no-such-thing-as-an-environmentally-friendly-diesel-car.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Environmentally Friendly Transport?</title>
		<link>http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/more-environmentally-friendly-transport.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/more-environmentally-friendly-transport.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clare Topping</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/more-environmentally-friendly-transport.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the end of September Daventry played host to a showcase for what some would consider to be the next generation of transport. This was featured in the National Press and on the National News (briefly). As this was heralded in the local press for several weeks before, it was with a small amount of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of September Daventry played host to a showcase for what some would consider to be the next generation of transport.  This was featured in the National Press and on the National News (briefly). As this was heralded in the local press for several weeks before, it was with a small amount of excitement that I went to go and look at the travel pods!!  I have to admit to a small amount of disappointment (why?  look at the photos below).<br />
<code><br />
</code></p>
<p align="left"><img src="http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/uploads/img_2278.jpg" alt="21st Century Travel?" border="1" height="290" hspace="6" vspace="5" width="195" /><img src="http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/uploads/img_2276.jpg" alt="Daventry Travel Pod" align="absbottom" border="1" height="290" hspace="6" vspace="5" width="195" /></p>
<p>Whilst it was publicised as only a prototype one can only hope that the next generation of travel pods will look better and travel a little faster than these golf-buggy wannabees.  Now don&#8217;t get me wrong, I am all for new and innovative transport solutions particularly from a town that several centuries before was a major coaching town, but I am not the type of person that needs convincing.  I try to walk wherever I can, but would be quite happy to be able to call up a pod to get to Long Buckby station, but I am not sure that many of the sceptics would be convinced to leave their cars behind when the prototype could be overtaken by anyone not requiring a walking aid (and I saw someone crash the buggy into the grass verge!)</p>
<p>The display that the council had did have some lovely graphics showing what they could look like, and I was informed that there would be a system installed in one of the London airports in the next couple of years, but the monorails looked a little like something that already exists in some American airports.  What I wanted to see was something a little more state of the art and modern that would put Daventry on the map, maybe we will get this one day, but it seems a long way off.<code></code><code></code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enviro-mentalist.org.uk/more-environmentally-friendly-transport.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

